<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophy quoting Dr. Greg House and Jewel&#8230;^-^</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shadowofawhim.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/philosophy-quoting-dr-greg-house-and-jewel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shadowofawhim.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/philosophy-quoting-dr-greg-house-and-jewel/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://shadowofawhim.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/philosophy-quoting-dr-greg-house-and-jewel/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shadowofawhim.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/philosophy-quoting-dr-greg-house-and-jewel/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Look into &#039;Branch Theory&#039;, I think you would find it as an intriguing opposition to the idea of predestination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look into &#8216;Branch Theory&#8217;, I think you would find it as an intriguing opposition to the idea of predestination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://shadowofawhim.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/philosophy-quoting-dr-greg-house-and-jewel/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shadowofawhim.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/philosophy-quoting-dr-greg-house-and-jewel/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Oh, and speaking of this life versus the next in our culture, check out today&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/25/us/25cemetery.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New York Times, &quot;Cemeteries Seek Breathing Clients&quot;:&lt;/a&gt;!
&lt;blockquote&gt;Historic cemeteries, desperate for money to pay for badly needed restorations, are reaching out to the public in ever more unusual ways, with dog parades, bird-watching lectures, Sunday jazz concerts, brunches with star chefs, Halloween parties in the crematory and even a nudie calendar.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and speaking of this life versus the next in our culture, check out today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/25/us/25cemetery.html" rel="nofollow">New York Times, &#8220;Cemeteries Seek Breathing Clients&#8221;:</a>!</p>
<blockquote><p>Historic cemeteries, desperate for money to pay for badly needed restorations, are reaching out to the public in ever more unusual ways, with dog parades, bird-watching lectures, Sunday jazz concerts, brunches with star chefs, Halloween parties in the crematory and even a nudie calendar.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://shadowofawhim.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/philosophy-quoting-dr-greg-house-and-jewel/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shadowofawhim.wordpress.com/2007/05/25/philosophy-quoting-dr-greg-house-and-jewel/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I like the studious intellectual (and human!) approach to religion taken by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.therevealer.org/aboutus.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jeff Sharlet and the Revealer&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Revealer is a daily review of religion in the news and the news about religion. We&#039;re not so much nonpartisan as polypartisan -- interested in all sides, disdainful of dualistic arguments, and enamored of free speech as a first principle. We publish and link to work by people of all persuasions, religious, political, sexual, and critical. The Revealer was conceived by Jay Rosen of New York University&#039;s Department of Journalism, and created by journalist Jeff Sharlet and staff. We begin with three basic premises:
1. Belief matters, whether or not you believe. Politics, pop culture, high art, NASCAR -- everything in this world is infused with concerns about the next. As journalists, as scholars, and as ordinary folks, we cannot afford to ignore the role of religious belief in shaping our lives.
2. The press all too frequently fails to acknowledge religion, categorizing it as either innocuous spirituality or dangerous fanaticism, when more often it&#039;s both and inbetween and just plain other.
3. We deserve and need better coverage of religion: &lt;a href=&quot;http://cockingasnook.wordpress.com/2007/05/24/power-of-story-rules-truth-both-literal-and-literary/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sharper thinking; deeper history; thicker description; basic theology; real storytelling&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the studious intellectual (and human!) approach to religion taken by <a href="http://www.therevealer.org/aboutus.php" rel="nofollow">Jeff Sharlet and the Revealer</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Revealer is a daily review of religion in the news and the news about religion. We&#8217;re not so much nonpartisan as polypartisan &#8212; interested in all sides, disdainful of dualistic arguments, and enamored of free speech as a first principle. We publish and link to work by people of all persuasions, religious, political, sexual, and critical. The Revealer was conceived by Jay Rosen of New York University&#8217;s Department of Journalism, and created by journalist Jeff Sharlet and staff. We begin with three basic premises:<br />
1. Belief matters, whether or not you believe. Politics, pop culture, high art, NASCAR &#8212; everything in this world is infused with concerns about the next. As journalists, as scholars, and as ordinary folks, we cannot afford to ignore the role of religious belief in shaping our lives.<br />
2. The press all too frequently fails to acknowledge religion, categorizing it as either innocuous spirituality or dangerous fanaticism, when more often it&#8217;s both and inbetween and just plain other.<br />
3. We deserve and need better coverage of religion: <a href="http://cockingasnook.wordpress.com/2007/05/24/power-of-story-rules-truth-both-literal-and-literary/" rel="nofollow">sharper thinking; deeper history; thicker description; basic theology; real storytelling</a>. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
