Does the Church play Tennis?

Why, you ask, would I pose such a ridiculous question? Well, it’s quite simple, because all I see when I look at the Church, is a racket.

Today, your own Pastor Kiki will prove, with Biblical support, that all the church is after is your money, and they want to use scare tactics to get it.

Please open your Bibles to Acts 4:32, we will be finishing chapter 4 and then going to 5:11. (I’ll pull specific quotes, here’s a link to the passage if you want to make sure that I’m legit. )

To sum it up for you, this passage is after the death and “resurrection” of Jesus. The church is functioning well, they are “gellin’ ” if you get my drift. A man is described who sells his land and gives all his money to the apostles, everybody loves him. Then another man and his wife are described who sell their land and only give part of the money to the apostles. One thing leads to another, and at the end of the passage, both the man and his wife are dead.

What, you ask? I’ll explain.

32All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they shared everything they had…34There were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned lands or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales 35and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone as he had need.

Ok, well first of all, may I point out how pseudo-communistic this sounds? Anyway, off topic. This point is that, at the get go, they want to establish that the money is being given back to the people. They want to redeem themselves, because the story they go on to recount is just plain scary.

36Joseph, a Levite from Cyprus, whom the apostles called Barnabas (which means Son of Encouragement), 37sold a field he owned and brought the money and put it at the apostles’ feet.

My question is: How do the people live after they sell this land? Was Joseph independently wealthy? What about Ananias (we’ll get to him in a minute.)? He may not have had the means that Joseph had, yet he is reprimanded.

1Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. 2With his wife’s full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles’ feet. 3Then Peter said, “Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? 4Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to men but to God.”

Does this not scream RACKET??? I mean, fuck, Ananias is being punished for giving some of his own money to the apostles. Talk about the apostles being selfish, it’s not enough that Ananias gives some money, they want it ALL, even though they don’t deserve any of it. We could question his motives, but the common idea is that he gave the money so that he could benefit his own reputation. That falls apart, because, if he really was worried about his reputation, he would have given all the money, but he didn’t. Everybody is too caught up with the fact that Ananias has a brain and realises that he cannot live without money, to see Joseph, over there, who gave everything he owned.

5When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear seized all who heard what had happened.

WTF?? Ok, I won’t go into ways he could have died, though tempting. But now, the apostles have everyone exactly where they want them. Everyone is scared to death because of this, which is going to put major money in the Apostles pockets.

7About three hours later his wife came in, not knowing what had happened. 8Peter asked her, “Tell me, is this the price you and Ananias got for the land?”
“Yes,” she said, “that is the price.”
9Peter said to her, “How could you agree to test the Spirit of the Lord?…10At that moment she fell down at his feet and died.

So, what is the moral of this story of Ananias and Sapphira? It is simple: It is never enough. The church always wants more, even more than you have to give. They don’t want you to live comfortably, or have money enough to educate yourself in the way of the world, because then you would have knowledge enough to look at their doctrine and their dogma and say, “Oh my God (no pun intended) this is complete $%#^”

Education is the biggest fear of the church, or at least secular education. Why do you think there are so many Christian schools? Why do you think that small children are sent to Sunday School from the time they are old enough to be away from their parents? Because the Church believes that if they can get to these children at a young age, they can brainwash them into believing whatever they put in front of them. Unfortunately, this is true.

11Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events.

Everyone was scared, and what do you think they did in their fear? They gave money to the apostles, to the Church. It’s irrelevant whether these events with Ananias and Sapphira really happened or not. The point is that the people believed it, and they acted in fear of them. The Church does not care why people give, as long as they do.

I’m not saying that the Church does not need money. Everyone in this world does. It’s a common denominator. What I have a problem with is how they motivate people to give, and what they claim they do with the money. If they honestly came out and said, we need the money to pay our staff, our pastors and all that jazz, then I would be like, fine. But they cloak it in the ideas that it all goes back to the community, when it really doesn’t.

They take advantage of people’s ignorance, and innocence, and it’s sickening.

So I say, “Love-Love” to this game of Tennis.

~ by yellowdancerkikki on 15 April 2007.

12 Responses to “Does the Church play Tennis?”

  1. Pay up or death. That is very mafia, I have to say.

  2. I was indoctrinated at a young age. I am 41 now, and in the last decade, I began to question my faith, and finally came to disbelieve. Still, it has only been in the past two years that I have been able to say “I am not a Christian” without fear. That stuff really messes with your head. My parents and sisters are convinced I am going to Hell, and urge me to take my children to church…NO WAY.

    I enjoyed this post…found my way here via Cocking the Snook.

  3. I’ve done both, tennis and protestant church stuff.

    In my lifetime the rackets for tennis got better and better, through research and science. The rules changed to accommodate the new possibilities.

    The rackets for church have gotten much worse. I don’t play anymore.

    Have you read abour this new superstitious ritualism of smearing holy oil all over government courthouses and capitol hearing rooms? And in Florida last year we had schoolfolk secretly “anointing” all the little kids’ desks, the night before the Big Test.
    Spiritual warfar they call it.
    Any god that would fall for that deserves the decay and decline that must surely follow, as human understanding of reality recedes.

    Keep up the good blogging!
    Doctor J

  4. Btw, did you know tennis used to be played by monks using human flesh as their rackets??

    google racket history and you’ll see. I wrote about this once at Culture Kitchen but I can’t recall for sure which essay it was! :)

    If I find it I will post a link; it makes a good story.

  5. LOL – actually it’s all about tennis power of story and how school/church treats individuals as interchangeable parts, to ill effect:

    I’ll really go now. :)
    Doctor J

  6. Or would, if the link had come through. Try again:

    Flash! WIMBLEDON WIDGET WOES: Intelligent Individuals OutRank Factory Robots!

  7. [...] Favorite Daughter you know. But here’s another young feminist I can’t wait to see take the world by the tail: Does the Church Play Tennis? [...]

  8. Great dissection of that story! I get tired of people picking on the same old Old Testament snippets about stonings, etc. Even the enlightened-and-loving New Testament has its “interesting” points. I have to say that I’m sympathetic to the “community” thing, but this story brings up a fairly dark side of practical communism to say the least.

    Also, I think it is relevant whether the events really happened. If they didn’t, then the story could be lie meant to scare people into submission. If it did happen, then it could simply be a bizarre story. But that’s a question we’ll never answer.

  9. However, if the story did not happen then it is the insitution employing scare tactics and if not then we know that there is actually a malevolent ‘god’ who is going to use violence to frighten people into belief. That is, if we are following the belief pattern which the story calls for. If we believe from the start that the ‘god’ does not exist then there is no problem and this is, as you put it, just a ‘bizarre story’.
    ~kiki

  10. Right, it matters whether God exists and whether God had anything to do with the events of the story. Is God malevolent? Is God just a really serious communist? Or is the church just using scare tactics? I think Occam’s razor will give you a pretty clear answer to those questions.

    But now that I’ve thought about it a little more, I realize that the important question is why the story was included in the first place. So I’m coming around to your claim that it’s irrelevant whether these things happened or not. I’m just a little slow sometimes.

  11. :) True. I like the thought of god as a communist. it is quite an interesting perspective, and makes quite a bit of sense. I would very much like to know the real intentions of the story.
    ~kiki

  12. ONLINE – DRUGSTORE!
    PRICES of ALL MEDICINES!

    FIND THAT NECESSARY…
    VIAGRA, CIALIS, PHENTERMINE, SOMA… and other pills!

    Welcome please: pills-prices.blogspot.com

    NEW INFORMATION ABOUT PAYDAY LOANS!

    Welcome please: payday-d-loans.blogspot.com

    GOOD LUCK!

Leave a Reply